Difference between revisions of "Arguments Against the Belief in God"
From Smiting Shepherds
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*Atheism explains disbelief better than theism | *Atheism explains disbelief better than theism | ||
*[[Creationism is False|The lack of evidence for creationism]]. | *[[Creationism is False|The lack of evidence for creationism]]. | ||
− | |||
*"Cruel World" argument | *"Cruel World" argument | ||
*The problems posed by [[Religious_pluralism|religious pluralism]] | *The problems posed by [[Religious_pluralism|religious pluralism]] |
Revision as of 17:47, 7 May 2017
- The Problem of Evil
- Omnipotence and Omniscience Arguments
- The arguments for the belief in God are weak and unconvincing, since they tend to rely on ambiguous terms, false premises, and/or logical fallacies.
- God as an unnecessary hypothesis/Unfalsifiability/The God of the Gaps
- There is no afterlife.
- ...and more specifically, Hell does not exist.
- Atheism explains disbelief better than theism
- The lack of evidence for creationism.
- "Cruel World" argument
- The problems posed by religious pluralism
- The religious are not moral exemplars.
- Neglecting life and the world
- Maxwell’s Demon
- There are other ways to overcome the fear of death (sense of purpose)