Difference between revisions of "Arguments Against the Belief in God"
From Smiting Shepherds
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
*Archeology and the Bible | *Archeology and the Bible | ||
*"Cruel World" argument | *"Cruel World" argument | ||
| − | *[[Religious_pluralism| | + | *The problems posed by [[Religious_pluralism|religious pluralism]] |
| − | *The religious are not moral exemplars. | + | *[[Religious_immorality|The religious ''are not'' moral exemplars.]] |
*Neglecting life and the world | *Neglecting life and the world | ||
*Maxwell’s Demon | *Maxwell’s Demon | ||
Revision as of 22:02, 27 April 2017
- The Problem of Evil
- Omnipotence and Omniscience Arguments
- The arguments for the belief in God are weak and unconvincing, since they tend to rely on ambiguous terms, false premises, and/or logical fallacies.
- God as an unnecessary hypothesis/Unfalsifiability/The God of the Gaps
- There is no afterlife. Specifically:
- Atheism explains disbelief better than theism
- Lack of evidence for creationism and the theological need for a literal Genesis.
- Archeology and the Bible
- "Cruel World" argument
- The problems posed by religious pluralism
- The religious are not moral exemplars.
- Neglecting life and the world
- Maxwell’s Demon
- There are other ways to overcome the fear of death (sense of purpose)
