Difference between revisions of "Arguments Against the Belief in God"
From Smiting Shepherds
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
*God as an unnecessary hypothesis/Unfalsifiability/The God of the Gaps | *God as an unnecessary hypothesis/Unfalsifiability/The God of the Gaps | ||
*[[There_is_no_Afterlife|There is no afterlife.]] | *[[There_is_no_Afterlife|There is no afterlife.]] | ||
| − | ** | + | **...and more specifically, [[Hell_does_not_Exist|Hell does not exist.]] |
*Atheism explains disbelief better than theism | *Atheism explains disbelief better than theism | ||
*Lack of evidence for creationism and the theological need for a literal Genesis. | *Lack of evidence for creationism and the theological need for a literal Genesis. | ||
Revision as of 22:13, 3 May 2017
- The Problem of Evil
- Omnipotence and Omniscience Arguments
- The arguments for the belief in God are weak and unconvincing, since they tend to rely on ambiguous terms, false premises, and/or logical fallacies.
- God as an unnecessary hypothesis/Unfalsifiability/The God of the Gaps
- There is no afterlife.
- ...and more specifically, Hell does not exist.
- Atheism explains disbelief better than theism
- Lack of evidence for creationism and the theological need for a literal Genesis.
- Archeology and the Bible
- "Cruel World" argument
- The problems posed by religious pluralism
- The religious are not moral exemplars.
- Neglecting life and the world
- Maxwell’s Demon
- There are other ways to overcome the fear of death (sense of purpose)
